Business identifiers assigned to this condition by the performer or other systems which remain constant as the resource is updated and propagates from server to server.

Allows identification of the condition as it is known by various participating systems and in a way that remains consistent across servers.

This is a business identifier, not a resource identifier (see discussion). It is best practice for the identifier to only appear on a single resource instance, however business practices may occasionally dictate that multiple resource instances with the same identifier can exist - possibly even with different resource types. For example, multiple Patient and a Person resource instance might share the same social insurance number.

The clinical status of the condition.

While the IPS-UV specification considers this a Must Support element, some systems will not have a field directly representing clinicalStatus, but have other means of differentiating between current and historical conditions. Implementers are expected to be able to differentiate between active and inactive conditions. However, the valueSet that is required in the base specification does not provide an 'unknown' concept to support legacy data without a clinicalStatus. This has resulted in additional burdens that some participating systems could not meet with their legacy data.

The requirement from the base FHIR specification to provide a system and value from the bound value set means the PS-CA CodeableConcept data type profile does not need to be applied on this particular element.

In the scope of the IPS-UV the entered-in-error concept is not allowed and so the modifier on this element has been removed.

The clinical status of the condition or diagnosis.

The verification status to support the clinical status of the condition.

IPS-UV no longer flags this as a Must Support element. It is not currently flagged as Must Support in PS-CA, as stakeholders have indicated the element may not be supported by the majority of systems today. Systems that do support the element are encouraged to include it in generated Patient Summary documents, and support it when received.

FHIR Base Note: This element is a modifier element with a required vocabulary binding in the base FHIR specification.

IPS-UV Note: In the scope of the IPS-UV the entered-in-error concept is not allowed and so the modifier on this element has been removed.

The verification status to support or decline the clinical status of the condition or diagnosis.

A category assigned to the condition. In this profile, a health problem of the patient, therefore a 'problem-list-item'.

IPS-UV flags this as a Must Support element. It is not currently flagged as Must Support in PS-CA, as stakeholders have indicated the element may not be supported by the majority of systems today. Systems that do support the element are encouraged to include it in generated Patient Summary documents, and support it when received.

Implementers should be aware that IPS encourages the use of 'problem-list-item'. This is identified through the additionalBinding extension as a component value set (which provides a subset of values from the base valueSet and context around their use).

IPS also provides an additionalBinding to the LOINC value of 75326-9 for backwards compatibility. While not preferred for continued use this is also identified as a additional binding to reflect what legacy IPS instances may include (in alignment to IPS approach).

A category assigned to the condition.

A subjective assessment of the severity of the condition as evaluated by the clinician.

IPS-UV flags this as a Must Support element. It is not currently flagged as Must Support in PS-CA, as stakeholders have indicated the element may not be supported by the majority of systems today. Systems that do support the element are encouraged to include it in generated Patient Summary documents, and support it when received.

A subjective assessment of the severity of the condition as evaluated by the clinician.

Identification of the condition, problem or diagnosis or recording of "problem absent" or of "problems unknown".

0..1 to account for primarily narrative only resources.

Many Canadian implementations use codes from either SNOMED CT and the SNOMED CT Canada Extension to describe this concept, while others may still be using localized code systems or text descriptions. The Condition - IPS ValueSet contains codes that are subsumed within the SNOMED CT CA ClinicalFindingCode ValueSet that is preferred for this element.

Future releases of PS-CA may require use of coded entries. In this release, however, implementations that support codings are encouraged to send the codings for codeable concepts if they are available. Consistent with FHIR best practice, receivers should not produce failures or rejections if codings are received. Vendors should expect that some jurisdictions may further constrain support of this element within the context of their own jurisdictional content.

Identification of the condition or diagnosis.

The anatomical location where this condition manifests itself.

Only used if not implicit in code found in Condition.code. If the use case requires attributes from the BodySite resource (e.g. to identify and track separately) then use the standard extension bodySite. May be a summary code, or a reference to a very precise definition of the location, or both.

Codes describing anatomical locations. May include laterality.

A reference to a location at which the other resource is found. The reference may be a relative reference, in which case it is relative to the service base URL, or an absolute URL that resolves to the location where the resource is found. The reference may be version specific or not. If the reference is not to a FHIR RESTful server, then it should be assumed to be version specific. Internal fragment references (start with '#') refer to contained resources.

Using absolute URLs provides a stable scalable approach suitable for a cloud/web context, while using relative/logical references provides a flexible approach suitable for use when trading across closed eco-system boundaries. Absolute URLs do not need to point to a FHIR RESTful server, though this is the preferred approach. If the URL conforms to the structure "/[type]/[id]" then it should be assumed that the reference is to a FHIR RESTful server.

The expected type of the target of the reference. If both Reference.type and Reference.reference are populated and Reference.reference is a FHIR URL, both SHALL be consistent.

The type is the Canonical URL of Resource Definition that is the type this reference refers to. References are URLs that are relative to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/ e.g. "Patient" is a reference to http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/Patient. Absolute URLs are only allowed for logical models (and can only be used in references in logical models, not resources).

This element is used to indicate the type of the target of the reference. This may be used which ever of the other elements are populated (or not). In some cases, the type of the target may be determined by inspection of the reference (e.g. a RESTful URL) or by resolving the target of the reference; if both the type and a reference is provided, the reference SHALL resolve to a resource of the same type as that specified.

Aa resource (or, for logical models, the URI of the logical model).

An identifier for the target resource. This is used when there is no way to reference the other resource directly, either because the entity it represents is not available through a FHIR server, or because there is no way for the author of the resource to convert a known identifier to an actual location. There is no requirement that a Reference.identifier point to something that is actually exposed as a FHIR instance, but it SHALL point to a business concept that would be expected to be exposed as a FHIR instance, and that instance would need to be of a FHIR resource type allowed by the reference.

When an identifier is provided in place of a reference, any system processing the reference will only be able to resolve the identifier to a reference if it understands the business context in which the identifier is used. Sometimes this is global (e.g. a national identifier) but often it is not. For this reason, none of the useful mechanisms described for working with references (e.g. chaining, includes) are possible, nor should servers be expected to be able resolve the reference. Servers may accept an identifier based reference untouched, resolve it, and/or reject it - see CapabilityStatement.rest.resource.referencePolicy.

When both an identifier and a literal reference are provided, the literal reference is preferred. Applications processing the resource are allowed - but not required - to check that the identifier matches the literal reference

Applications converting a logical reference to a literal reference may choose to leave the logical reference present, or remove it.

Reference is intended to point to a structure that can potentially be expressed as a FHIR resource, though there is no need for it to exist as an actual FHIR resource instance - except in as much as an application wishes to actual find the target of the reference. The content referred to be the identifier must meet the logical constraints implied by any limitations on what resource types are permitted for the reference. For example, it would not be legitimate to send the identifier for a drug prescription if the type were Reference(Observation|DiagnosticReport). One of the use-cases for Reference.identifier is the situation where no FHIR representation exists (where the type is Reference (Any).

Plain text narrative that identifies the resource in addition to the resource reference.

This is generally not the same as the Resource.text of the referenced resource. The purpose is to identify what's being referenced, not to fully describe it.

The Encounter during which this Condition was created or to which the creation of this record is tightly associated.

This will typically be the encounter the event occurred within, but some activities may be initiated prior to or after the official completion of an encounter but still be tied to the context of the encounter. This record indicates the encounter this particular record is associated with. In the case of a "new" diagnosis reflecting ongoing/revised information about the condition, this might be distinct from the first encounter in which the underlying condition was first "known".

Estimated or actual date or date-time the condition began, in the opinion of the clinician.

Age is generally used when the patient reports an age at which the Condition began to occur.

The recordedDate represents when this particular Condition record was created in the system, which is often a system-generated date.

Individual who recorded the record and takes responsibility for its content.

Individual who is making the condition statement.

A simple summary of the stage such as "Stage 3". The determination of the stage is disease-specific.

Codes describing condition stages (e.g. Cancer stages).

Reference to a formal record of the evidence on which the staging assessment is based.

The kind of staging, such as pathological or clinical staging.

Codes describing the kind of condition staging (e.g. clinical or pathological).

A manifestation or symptom that led to the recording of this condition.

Codes that describe the manifestation or symptoms of a condition.

Links to other relevant information, including pathology reports.

Additional information about the Condition. This is a general notes/comments entry for description of the Condition, its diagnosis and prognosis.